Background: The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is quite high after laparoscopic surgeries. This study endeavors to compare the efficacy of the combination of palonosetron and dexamethasone with that of either drug alone in the prevention of PONV in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries. Methods: This randomized, parallel-group trial was done on ninety adults of American Society of Anesthesiologists Grade I and II patients aged 18–60 years undergoing laparoscopic surgeries under general anesthesia. The patients were randomly divided into three groups of thirty patients each. Group P (n = 30) received palonosetron 0.075 mg intravenously (iv), Group D (n = 30) received dexamethasone 8 mg iv and Group P + D (n = 30) received palonosetron 0.075 mg and dexamethasone 8 mg iv. The primary outcome was incidence of PONV in 24 h, and the secondary outcome was a number of rescue antiemetics required. To compare the proportions in the groups, unpaired t-test, Mann–Whitney U-test, Chi-square test, or Fisher's exact test was applied. Results: We found that the overall incidence of PONV was 46.7% in Group P, 50% in Group D, and 43.3% in Group P + D during the first 24 h. Rescue antiemetic was required in 27% of the patients in Group P and Group D compared to 23% of the patients in Group P + D and twice in 3% of the patients in Group P, 7% of the patients in Group D, and none in Group P + D which were not significant. Conclusions: The combination therapy of palonosetron plus dexamethasone did not significantly reduce the incidence of PONV when compared with either drug alone.

Background: Intravenous (IV) regional anesthesia is an easy, safe, reliable, and efficient option for inducing anesthesia during surgeries but with tourniquet-related pain. This study aimed to evaluate midazolam, paracetamol, tramadol, and magnesium sulfate administration as adjuvants with ropivacaine on pain relief and hemodynamic changes in IV regional anesthesia. Methods: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in subjects undergoing forearm surgery with IV regional anesthesia. The block randomization method was used to assign eligible participants to each of five study groups. Hemodynamic parameters were assessed before applying the tourniquet, at prespecified time points (5, 10, 15, and 20 min), then and every subsequent 10 min until surgery completion. A Visual Analog Scale was used to assess pain severity at baseline followed by every 15 min until completion of the surgery, and after tourniquet deflation every 30 min to 2 h, and at 6, 12, and 24 h postoperative. Data were analyzed using Chi-square and analysis of variance with repeated data testing. Results: The shortest onset and the longest duration of sensory block were observed in the tramadol group and the shortest onset of motor block in the midazolam group (P < 0.001). Pain score was estimated to be significantly lower in the tramadol group at the time of tourniquet application and release, and 15 min to 12 h after tourniquet release (P < 0.05). In addition, the lowest dose of pethidine consumption was observed in the tramadol group (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Tramadol appeared to be able to effectively relieve pain, shorten the onset of sensory block, prolong the duration of sensory block, and achieve the lowest consumption of pethidine.

Background: Surgery is a well-known and effective method of treating lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. The present study aimed to compare the effects of administering tranexamic acid (TXA), nitroglycerin (NTG), and remifentanil (REF) on hemorrhage prevention during herniated lumbar intervertebral disc surgery. Methods: A double-blind clinical trial was conducted on 135 participants undergoing lumbar intervertebral disc surgery. A randomized block design was used for subject assignment to three groups including TXA, NTG, and REF. The hemodynamic parameters, bleeding rate, hemoglobin level, and the amount of infused propofol were measured and recorded after surgery. Data were then analyzed in SPSS software using Chi-square test and analysis of variance. Results: The mean age of participants in the study was 42.12 ± 7.93 years, and all three groups were equal in terms of demographic characteristics (P > 0.05). The mean arterial pressure (MAP) of the TXA and NTG groups was notably higher than the REF group (P < 0.008). The mean heart rate (HR) of the TXA and NTG groups was notably higher than the REF group (P < 0.05). The propofol dosage used in the TXA group was higher than the two groups of NTG and REF (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Among participants undergoing lumbar intervertebral disc surgery, the greatest MAP variability was observed in the NTG group. Higher mean HR and propofol consumption was observed in the NTG and TXA groups when compared to REF. No statistically significant differences were noted between groups in oxygen saturation or bleeding risk. Based on these findings, REF may be considered a preferred surgical adjunct over TXA and NTG during lumbar intervertebral disc surgery.

Background: High in-hospital mortality in sepsis patients remains challenging for clinicians worldwide. Early recognition, prognostication, and aggressive management are essential for treating septic patients. Many scores have been formulated to guide clinicians to predict the early deterioration of such patients. Our objective was to compare predictive values of quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) and National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) with respect to in-hospital mortality. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary care center in India. Adults with suspected infection with at least two Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome criteria presenting to the emergency department (ED) were enrolled. NEWS2 and qSOFA scores were calculated, and patients were followed until their primary outcome of mortality or hospital discharge. The diagnostic accuracy of qSOFA and NEWS2 for predicting mortality was analyzed. Results: Three hundred and seventy-three patients were enrolled. Overall mortality was 35.12%. A majority of patients had LOS between 2 and 6 days (43.70%). NEWS2 had higher area under curve at 0.781 (95% confidence interval [CI] (0.59, 0.97)) than qSOFA at 0.729 (95% CI [0.51, 0.94]), with P < 0.001. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic efficiency to predict mortality by NEWS2 were 83.21% (95% CI [83.17%, 83.24%]); 57.44% (95% CI [57.39%, 57.49%]); and 66.48% (95% CI [66.43%, 66.53%]), respectively. qSOFA score had sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic efficiency to predict mortality of 77.10% (95% CI [77.06%, 77.14%]); 42.98% (95% CI [42.92%, 43.03%]); and 54.95% (95% CI [54.90%, 55.00%]), respectively. Conclusion: NEWS2 is superior to qSOFA in predicting in-hospital mortality for sepsis patients presenting to the ED in India.

Background: On intensive care unit (ICU) admission, it is difficult to predict which patient may harbor multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. MDR is the nonsusceptibility of bacteria to at least one antibiotic in three or more antimicrobial categories. Vitamin C inhibits bacterial biofilms, and its incorporation into the modified nutritional risk in critically ill (mNUTRIC) scores may help predict MDR bacterial sepsis early. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on adult subjects with sepsis. Plasma Vitamin C level was estimated within 24 h of ICU admission, and it was incorporated into the mNUTRIC score (designated as Vitamin C nutritional risk in critically ill [vNUTRIC]). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine if vNUTRIC was an independent predictor of MDR bacterial culture in sepsis subjects. The receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted to determine the vNUTRIC cutoff score for predicting MDR bacterial culture. Results: A total of 103 patients were recruited. The bacterial culture-positive sepsis subjects were 58/103, with 49/58 culture-positive subjects having MDR. The vNUTRIC score on ICU admission in the MDR bacteria group was 6.71 ± 1.92 versus 5.42 ± 2.2 in the non-MDR bacteria group (P = 0.003, Independent Student's t-test). High vNUTRIC score ≥6 on admission is associated with MDR bacteria (P = 0.042 Chi-Square test), and is a predictor of MDR bacteria (P = 0.003, AUC 0.671, 95% confidence interval [0.568–0.775], sensitivity 71%, specificity 48%). Logistic regression showed that the vNUTRIC score is an independent predictor of MDR bacteria. Conclusion: High vNUTRIC score (≥6) on ICU admission in sepsis subjects is associated with MDR bacteria.

The fields of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Critical Care often share medically and surgically complex patients. Peripartum anatomic and physiologic changes can predispose or exacerbate certain conditions and rapid action is often needed. This review discusses some of the most common conditions responsible for the admission of obstetrical and gynecological patients to the critical care unit. We will consider both obstetrical and gynecologic concepts including postpartum hemorrhage, antepartum hemorrhage, abnormal uterine bleeding, preeclampsia and eclampsia, venous thromboembolism, amniotic fluid embolism, sepsis and septic shock, obstetrical trauma, acute abdomen, malignancies, peripartum cardiomyopathy, and substance abuse. This article aims to be a primer for the Critical Care provider.