Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Users Online: 620

 

Home  | About Us | Editors | Search | Ahead Of Print | Current Issue | Archives | Submit Article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts | Login 
     


 
 
Table of Contents
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 287-288

Patient care delays due to scene safety


1 Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
2 Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

Date of Web Publication2-Jan-2014

Correspondence Address:
Jared N Strote
Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2229-5151.124177

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Strote JN, Hutson H R. Patient care delays due to scene safety. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci 2013;3:287-8

How to cite this URL:
Strote JN, Hutson H R. Patient care delays due to scene safety. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci [serial online] 2013 [cited 2022 Dec 7];3:287-8. Available from: https://www.ijciis.org/text.asp?2013/3/4/287/124177

Sir,

Recently, responding to a 911 call of 'gunshots fired', two law-enforcement officers arrived within a minute and found an unresponsive victim but were unable to allow Emergency Medical Services (EMS) on the scene as a crowd of approximately 30 bystanders became increasingly hostile, both threatening and physically assaulting the officers. Within seven minutes, approximately 20 officers had arrived and the crowd was dispersed.

Once the scene was secured, paramedics found a 31-year-old male with three gunshot wounds to his chest. The patient maintained palpable pulses until just prior to arrival in the hospital. In the emergency department, the patient remained pulseless and unresponsive. Bilateral thoracotomies were performed and the patient was found to have penetration of the superior vena cava without injury to the heart. Open cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with intracardiac epinephrine was performed and massive blood and plasma transfusions were administrated, but the patient could not be resuscitated.

It is well established that the response time of EMS has a significant effect on morbidity and mortality for patients with severe medical or traumatic conditions. Although EMS delays in patient care have many different causes, no studies examine delays from safety risks for EMS personnel.

On-scene violence and danger is real and not uncommon. Studies of urban EMS systems report violence occurring in 5% of all calls and immediately ending just prior to the arrival of EMS in another 14%. [1],[2] When surveyed, 60-90% of EMS providers reported having been assaulted on the job. [3]

Responding to a shooting, the risks are increased, even if the perpetrator is no longer present. In gang-related violence, there is, frequently, a risk of further attempts at harming the patient or a retaliatory act. In cities where tensions exist between the public and law enforcement, violence can erupt indiscriminately against all first responders. [4],[5]

In the case presented here, it is by no means clear whether the patient would have survived if EMS had been on the scene without delay. The case does serve as a reminder, however, that although we know that provider safety should always take precedence, there is no best practice for EMS security. Different EMS systems have facilities ranging from nothing at all to mandated body armor, police escorts, and armored personnel carriers. [3],[4] Studies are needed to examine what protocols and systems-level planning can maximize safety for both patient and provider.

Simultaneously, health-care providers have a responsibility to educate the public about the effects of crowd anger on limiting the access of care to a victim as well as inciting further violence. Although improving care under any circumstances should remain our goal, decreasing violence ultimately, as a society, is the most effective way of protecting both our patients and ourselves.

 
   References Top

1.Grange JT, Corbett SW. Violence against emergency medical services personnel. Prehosp Emerg Care 2002;6:186-90.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Mock EF, Wrenn KD, Wright SW, Eustis TC, Slovis CM. Anxiety levels in EMS providers: Effects of violence and shifts schedules. Am J Emerg Med 1999;17:509-11.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Corbett SW, Grange JT, Thomas TL. Exposure of prehospital care providers to violence. Prehosp Emerg Care 1998;2:127-31.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Eckstein M, Cowen AR. Scene safety in the face of automatic weapons fire: A new dilemma for EMS? Prehosp Emerg Care 1998;2:117-22.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Krebs D. When violence erupts: A survival guide for emergency responders. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett; 2003.  Back to cited text no. 5
    



This article has been cited by
1 Ersteinschätzung ohne Hilfsmittel – Schritt für Schritt
Linus Liss
retten!. 2021; 10(01): 66
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 A US National Study of the Association Between Income and Ambulance Response Time in Cardiac Arrest
Renee Y. Hsia,Delphine Huang,N. Clay Mann,Christopher Colwell,Mary P. Mercer,Mengtao Dai,Matthew J. Niedzwiecki
JAMA Network Open. 2018; 1(7): e185202
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2038    
    Printed64    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded43    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal